Maybe we <<shareholders>> can make noise and get her fired...
The only difference in what she has done and what may have been going on since the days of CF is that she got caught. Remember when Carly was running HP she had majoe shareholders vote with her influence. Is this any different? Fire the B member I say....
Off with her <<fill in the blank>>, or maybe make her walk the <<fill in the blank>>
My opnion
-------------- Original message from "Senn, Bruce" <[log in to unmask]>: --------------
> So, what is wrong with this picture?
>
> The two board members, whose privacy was allegedly violated, resign, and
> the instigator of the investigation, just has to move her chair from the
> head of the board table to the side.
>
> The "leakers" are gone and the "overzealous investigator" continues to
> govern HP.
>
> Bruce.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> Bruce J. Senn Phone: (518) 388-6664
> Senior System Manager FAX: (518) 388-6458
> Union College E-mail: [log in to unmask]
> Schenectady, NY 12308 WWW: http://www1.union.edu/~sennb
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> Behalf Of Ron Seybold
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 3:10 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Patricia Dunn will step down
>
> Hello Friends:
>
> Can you tell us how HP's privacy blunder affects your relationship
> with the company?
>
> We've posted a new article on our NewsWire NewsBlog
> about today's developments. Much more
> interesting than HP's main press release on the matter is the
> company's report on director Keyworth's resignation.
>
> HP was careful to express its regret for violating the privacy of its
> directors, now both resigned: Keyworth and Tom Perkins. No such
> regrets have yet been delivered for hounding the personal phone
> records of close to a dozen reporters and their family members.
>
> We should all keep in mind there are two HPs: the one that allowed
> this blunder to happen, without adequate oversight; and the one that
> still serves the 3000 community at the "worker bee" level. I already
> have Alfredo Rego's well-crafted reply in hand, responding to our
> spot poll on the impact of this investigative hoax.
>
> I invite you all to answer the same question that Alfredo did,
> whether you're continuing with HP as your enterprise vendor, or
> staying on the 3000 but separating from HP.
>
> For the record, the legality of these tactics is still in play. If
> criminal or civil claims arise from this hoax, we can all hope that
> "pretexting" becomes as illegal as ethics make it appear.
> --
>
> Ron Seybold, Editor In Chief
> The 3000 NewsWire -- 512.331.0075 -- [log in to unmask]
> Independent Information to Maximize Your HP 3000
> NewsWire Blog -- http://3000newswire.com/blog
> Main Web site -- http://www.3000newswire.com
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
