HP3000-L Archives

May 1999, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Doug Werth <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Doug Werth <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 14 May 1999 09:51:37 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Gilles wrote:

>
>It's more desireable to assign each mirror set to different SCSI cards -
>but not always possible - and certainly not a reqirement.
>
>In any case, depending upon the environment, mirroring on a single SCSI
>card is preferable to not mirroring at all, though probably less desireable
>than using multiple SCSI cards.
>


Gilles is correct. It all depends on why you are mirroring. If you are
mirroring simply to protect the data against disk failure, then having
mirrored pairs on the same card can be OK (performance issues aside.) Of
course, you have to take into account that a hardware failure on a SCSI
adapter could corrupt both partners.

If you are mirroring to reduce downtime then you want to have the mirrored
pairs on separate adapters. For this option there should not be any single
point of failure, such as a SCSI adapter.

Doug.

Doug Werth                                     Beechglen Development Inc.
[log in to unmask]                                       Cincinnati, Ohio

The opinions expressed do not necessarily represent the views or opinions
of Beechglen Development. They might, but not necessarily. They represent
solely the opinions of the author.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2