News from our own Washington post story about disclosure and what is normal for reporting an incident.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2006/02/14/BL2006021401067.html?referrer=email&referrer=email&referrer=email
It is a Democratic newspaper with a slant, right Denys? So we are to assume that this news is made up as well.
Your Friend
Joe
-------------- Original message from Denys Beauchemin <[log in to unmask]>: --------------
> Joe wrote:
> "What was the real story behind the shooting "wisky bottle shooting"
> after a good day of drinking?
>
> Does the VP take part in the bottle?
>
> Why else would you leave a gap in reporting a shooting or not let the
> police investigate until12 to 18 hrs later. Sort of like when Kennedy
> drove his car off a bridge and went home so he could sober up."
>
> To which I write:
>
> People seem to be forgetting the fact the VP is surrounded by a bunch
> of people wherever he goes. His own medical team is the one that took
> care of the victim at the scene and then transported him to the
> hospital.
>
> Joe, you're a smart man; do you honestly think the Secret Service
> detail accompanying the VP would have let him or anyone else around
> him drink alcohol and then fire guns? Get real.
>
> And what's with the gap in reporting a shooting and the Kennedy
> incident? Kennedy crashed his car, and then left the scene of the
> accident with a woman drowning in the back seat. He went home and
> sobbered up as she died.
>
> In this case, it was a silly accident but the first concern was for
> the victim and there were a lot of people around, including law
> enforcement, ie the Secret Service.
>
> I do not remember that it was necessary to immediately inform the
> newspapers of an accident. That's a new one on me.
>
> It is clear that Cheney is at fault here, but stuff happens.
>
> What is sad is that because of this stupid accident, the president and
> the VP will probably not be able to go hunting anymore. Whether you
> approve of humting or not is not the issue, it's just another thing in
> which the occupant of the White House and the VP will be forbidden to
> partake in the future.
>
> It reminds me of the incident in the late 1970s when the newly-elected
> prime minister of Quebec was driving himself with his lady friend at
> 3:00AM and he hit a man on the street. When the police showed up,
> they gave a blood test to... the dead guy on the ground. But from
> that point forward, the PM was not allowed to drive by himself or even
> be alone.
>
> So go ahead and look for a sinister side to this hunting accident, as
> for me, I just feel sadness for the victim and for the VP who must be
> beside himself with grief.
>
> Denys.
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|