Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:05:16 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Curt,
So you believe that Eloquence is economically viable solution because it is on Unix boxes?
Terry Warns
In a message dated Tue, 23 Jul 2002 4:02:04 PM Eastern Standard Time, [log in to unmask] writes:
>
>
> my understanding is that is has been used on the Unix boxes for some time,
> so it does not depend on the hp3000.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> I listened to the Web conference today about Eloquence. I do not doubt the
> technical aspects of the product. I do not want to discuss the technical
> merits.
>
> What I doubt is the economic long term viability of the product.
>
> They claim 2,000 users today. I would estimate that if they got every
> HP3000 in use today,As a standalone product, whose long term survival is the
> success of that product alone, it just seems as a very risky long term
> solution.
>
> Terry Warns
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit
> http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|