Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 27 Oct 1999 09:29:15 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
It is true. However, some 3rd Party backup software interpret @[log in to unmask]@ to mean
/. (I know RoadRunner does)
-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
Behalf Of Rick Clark
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 1999 8:45 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Reload sanity check
It's true. If not, I'm in deep doo doo....... ;-)
Rick Clark
Senior Systems Analyst
WW&R
Cleveland, Ohio
Joe Geiser wrote:
>
> Mark Undrill writes,
>
> > Err. Shouldn't that be STORE/RESTORE /;.... not STORE/RESTORE
> > @[log in to unmask]@;....
>
> Actually, I believe Mark, that as of 5.0 or 5.5, the use of either / or
@[log in to unmask]@
> in a :STORE or :RESTORE operation were equal, and both will catch HFS
files.
> This was done because of the confusion early on, when users were still
using
> @[log in to unmask]@ and not catching the HFS files. We use @[log in to unmask]@ all the time under 5.5
and
> 6.0, and all of the HFS files are found and stored.
>
> Regards,
> Joe
|
|
|