HP3000-L Archives

August 2000, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Hornsby <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mike Hornsby <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Aug 2000 08:49:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
A terrific table to decode this mystical HP information can be found at:
http://businessservers.hp.com/europe/news/tiers.html

According to it the:
928LX/RX is a tier 1 or 310
929KS/020 is a tier 4 or 330

This is somewhat misleading in that no CPL systems are in tier 2, 3, 5 or 7.

Cordially,

Mike Hornsby
Co-founder/Chief Technical Officer
Beechglen Development Inc. (www.beechglen.com)
5576 Glenway Ave.
Cincinnati, Ohio 45238
(513) 922-0509






----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Sielaff" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 6:30 PM
Subject: [HP3000-L] Conflicting reports.


I am getting conflicting reports on what tier the 928 and 929
belong to.  HP (telesales) told me they are both tier 3 or 320 what
ever that means.  Cognos says 928 is a 320 and 929 is a 340.
I.E. 928 cognos upgrade from my 937 is 4k and the 929 cognos
upgrade from my 937 is 24k.
Can anyone shed a little more light on this?
Mystified in Moses Lake
Gary

ATOM RSS1 RSS2