Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:38:04 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Wayne asks:
> << They are CUML >>
> tags, and according to the published specifications for CUML, they are
> << perfectly well-formed.
> >>
>
> Ok, I'll bite... what is CUML? Credit Union Markup Language? CUstom
Markup
> Language???
It's anything you want it to be.
I was just kidding with Mark, inventing another Markup Language as an
Extended Sendup (XSL) of Mark's fascination with XML (Inventing markup
languages is not difficult; wait 10 minutes and someone else will have a new
one for you to learn).
However, what I said was true: in this fictitious CUML language, the
<cu..>-thingies tags *are* "well-formed." They may not be well-formed by XML,
PostScript or Swahili rules, but that's irrelevant to their use in the case
of CUSoon. There, they work amazingly well.
Wirt Atmar
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|