John noted:
> Ken Sletten writes:
> >do we *really* have to spend the time it will take to allow a
> >"decent interval" for debate and then voting ??
>
> HP can certainly add the capability in an MPE-standard way
> without the input of the user community. If they want that input,
> however, they should do it in a way that will accurately reflect
> the opinions of that community. The conclusions represented
> in Sashi's message this morning were flawed, it seems.
Yes; I agree with your above....
> .... If the Interex ballot idea is too slow, perhaps an informal
> e-mail ballot would be a good alternative.
I have no problem with an email vote if consensus supports
doing that.... I vote for the "Gavin spec" + ";CANCEL"......
:-) ,
Ken Sletten
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *