HP3000-L Archives

February 2000, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Randall Davis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Randall Davis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Feb 2000 13:32:51 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (850 bytes) , rdavis.vcf (542 bytes)
yes, some of them I believe still are.  We had significant NS issues with
6.0.  We loaded powerpatch 1 and 12 (I think) supplemental patches to get
us stable (which I believe we finally now are... well... stabler anyway...
today was day 33 without a crash.).  Of those 12, I guess that 5-6 of them
are still considered beta.  Although some may have gone GR by now.  I am
supposed to receive notification from HP when this occurs, but so far, I've
received no such notification.

Randall Davis

Robert Joseph wrote:

> Are the 6.0 patches for socket problems considered beta?  Also, can you
> give the patch id's for those of us who also would like to consider
> them.  We have had some problems with the listeners for WhisperTech
> Programmer Studio and Leetech AIM/CSF and both vendors seem to indicate
> that HP networking is the culprit.
>
> Rob Joseph
> The NPD Group


ATOM RSS1 RSS2