 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Apr 1999 10:20:16 -0700 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
John Dunlop wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, April 14, 1999 23:55, B T Vikram Kumar wrote,
>
> >> I remember to have seen the following additional
> >> dates also for testing (not sure of the resoning of
> >> each).
> >> 08/21/99, 09/10/99, 02/28/2000, 03/01/2000, 12/31/2000,
> >> 01/01/2001
>
Another one to check (for those using Julian date routines
is 00366, to see if the Julian date handled the leap year
correctly.
--
Buz (8
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
| Knowledge is proud that it has learn'd so much; |
| Wisdom is humble that it knows no more. |
| -- William Cooper: _The Task VI_ |
+---------------------------------------+----------------------+
| This is official written notice: | My real address is: |
| Please remove me from your mailing | lnuslad dot dzvg41 |
| list. | at eds dot com |
+---------------------------------------+----------------------+
|
|
|
