HP3000-L Archives

March 2002, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Guy HPTraderOnline <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Guy HPTraderOnline <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 1 Mar 2002 09:31:35 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
And God commanded, "Go forth and evolve not!"

We only believe we evolved here.  There are very large monuments on Mars
which could be explained away if looked at individually.  However, they are
all configured to match our own ancient monuments.
http://www.planetarymysteries.com/mars/totzek/index.html

Could humans have inhabited Mars first, then Earth? Or maybe a homesteading
movement like the Oregon, California trail.

Guy
www.hptraderonline.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Dirickson" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: Ohio wants to teach "2001" in 2 002and beyond


> > Remember the context of this discussion:  Intelligent design
> > theory.  It is
> > the opinion of the author of the web page I cited that
> > natural selection
> > performs all the functions of an intelligent designer, which
> > was formerly
> > known as God, Christian or otherwise.  In other words, he is
> > saying that we
> > have merely swapped one definition of God for another when we
> propose
> > natural selection as the the Designer.
> > ....
> > In general, theologians have always pondered how we got here
> > and why we are
> > here.  These are questions that evolution tries to answer as well.
>
> I don't see it. Evolution provides an answer--that appears to be
> elegant, consistent, and complete--to "how"; I don't see anything
> anywhere in it that remotely tries to address "why". Which is why this
> "you must choose God or evolution" thing seems so stupid to me:
> allowing only one of them means that you'll always be "wrong", because
> you'll have only part of the answer.
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2