HP3000-L Archives

August 2000, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nick Demos <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nick Demos <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 15:55:14 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Donna Garverick wrote:
>
> "HOFMEISTER,JAMES (HP-USA,ex1)" wrote:
>
> > I would suggest you pursue an enhancement request for INETD to increase
> > the functionality to support running INETD as a system process and
> > create the service processes at the appropriate user priority levels.
> > I have recommended this solution in the past SR 4701-371708 but I was
> > disappointed with the final ";PRI=CS" solution.  I would suggest a new
> > SR - Enhancement Request be submitted and of course talk up this need
> > at HP-World.
>
> fwiw....  the #7 item (in terms of number of votes) from this year sysman
> ballot was:
>
> Pass a priority to services launched by INETD via a parameter rather than
> allowing simple inheritance from the priority of the root INETD process.
> (votes: 36)
>
I think this is a wasted effort.  As Wirt suggest, just run INETD in the
B
queue if you want a high priority for logons.  Your choice.

Nick D.

P. S.  Hp might help by announcing this as an approved and supported
       remedy.

NMD

ATOM RSS1 RSS2