Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 23 Oct 1999 00:31:14 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I suggest you look into HP's Transact. It is much cheaper than
Speedware,
very easy to code and you can't tell the difference in efficiency
between it
and Cobol without a microscope.
Nick D.
Tom Hula wrote:
>
> I was originally planning on converting our Protos applications to
> Speedware, along with any new programs. We have long since
> abandoned that and still have a third-party application using
> Speedware. My impressions are:
> - The development environment is a good example of what you would
> find with many other 4GL's with an "object-oriented" approach.
> They did a good job with it. It is very similar to the
> environment I used when I did some programming with Informix.
> - The one application we have running on our system using Speedware
> is a drain on our entire system. An extreme hog. From what I
> have heard since, this is fairly typical of Speedware applications.
> Our existing Cobol and Protos/Cobol applications are extremely
> efficient, taking up little in the way of resource.
> - I could get a larger box to make up for Speedware, but why should
> I? Cobol 85, although not as fast to develop in as some of the
> 4GL's, has many of the 4GL coding conventions built into it now
> and is as efficient as ever. I hope that Speedware is just a
> bad example of what a 4GL could be.
> Tom Hula
> Victor S. Barnes
>
> [log in to unmask] wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > I am looking for some personal opinions on SpeedWare v6.0 to evaluate
> > if we should consider migrating some legacy in-house applications to
> > another environment. The most of the applications are running
> > SpeedWare v6 on an HP 3000/958 MPE/XL 5.5. There are some scattered
> > SpeedWare v5 around. If you are using it, or have used it, here are
> > some of my questions:
> >
> > 1. What is your overall impression with the product as compared to
> > other 4GLs?
> >
> > 2. How well does it support web-enabled requirements?
> >
> > 3. Where do you see SpeedWare for the long-term? Is it an in-demand
> > product? Or, is it being superceded by other products? If the later,
> > which products are replacing it?
> >
> > 4. Are SpeedWare programmers a difficult to find?
> >
> > 5. Is there anything else I should consider?
> >
> > Thanks for your help!
> >
> > LuAnne
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > Before you buy.
|
|
|