LISTSERV - HP3000-L Archives

HP3000-L Archives

September 2004, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	HP3000-L Home
	HP3000-L September 2004, Week 1

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: 979 vs. 989
From:	Duane Percox <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Duane Percox <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Tue, 7 Sep 2004 17:47:38 -0800
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (19 lines)

Craig queries the list:
>Sorry for the on-topic discussion....
>
>I know someone on the list has this information in their brain.
>
>I know that the 979 has 180Mhz CPU's and the 989KS has 240 Mhz CPU's.
>
>But my question, is the backplane any faster on the 989, if
>so, how much faster, and would there be any improvement in I/O?

Sorry don't know your answer, but wanted to let you
know that the early 989ks boxes (/100,/200, etc) were 200mhz
and the later (/150,/250, etc) were 240mhz. Both have 2mb cache.

duane

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

RAVEN.UTC.EDU