HP3000-L Archives

November 2001, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Clogg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
John Clogg <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 14:12:39 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Porting it to the 80x86/Pentium architecture would be a large effort that
might be of questionable feasibility.  Porting to IA-64, on the other hand,
is presumably less difficult and may in fact be under way.  It has been HP's
stated intention to do exactly that for some time now.

-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:46 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: nasty rumor


Would it be possible to port MPE to Intel platform?



David T Darnell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Well, I HAVE been pondering the possibility of MPE/HP3000 getting "sold
off". but, wherefrom the hardware - if HP continues to
>  make the nearly identical HP9000 hardware (except for what, an EPROM and
some badging, and a faster clock?) then there's a potential hardware
platform for MPE.
> but would HP want to enter into such an agreement?  Isn't PA/RISC being
replaced?
> What more readily available hardware could MPE and it's subsystems be
ported to?

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2