HP3000-L Archives

May 1995, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Interex Information Manager <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Interex Information Manager <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 8 May 1995 10:23:19 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
On Fri, 5 May 1995, Stan Sieler wrote:
>[snip]
> If the majority wants a command instead of a programmatic thing, then
> that simply means one thing:
>
>    they want a command.
>
> It DOESN'T mean:
>
>    the majority is right;
>
> With programmatic access, a trivial program can be written by almost
> anyone...and (almost certainly)...several will pop up in the CSL.
 
For the record, several already exist in the CSL to do this
already.  You are correct on the programmatic interface.  Any
enhancement should include:  intrinsic access (AIFs perhaps);
FINFO (command line), and an MPE command.  This should be
for all intrinsics, like FOPEN, FREAD, FWRITE, etc.  Just
my opinion, of course.
 
--
 
     john sullivan
     [log in to unmask]  http://www.interex.org/~sullivan/
     phone: 408 747 0227

ATOM RSS1 RSS2