In article <[log in to unmask]>, Bruce Conrad
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>I got a e-cd in the mail the other day from eHP about HP solutions. I haven't
>bothered to check out the CD Rom yet,
>but the packaging lists info on HP Servers (HP 9000/unix), NetServers
>(Linux/NT), e-services, HP Storage Systems, HP Printers, and HP PC's. Naturally,
>it looks like they left out information on the HP 3000 - it certainly doesn't
>make me too keen
>on using the CD...
>It is rather sad when a company has an incredibly good product that they try to
>keep secret. My suspicion is that most HP management folks are aware that the HP
>3000 is so much "better" (easy to use, reliable, etc) than the 9000's, NT or
>Windows systems that they sell that they don't want to embarass themselves by
>promoting something OTHER than the current trend of Unix/Windows systems.
>
*Somebody* in HP must know about the value of the HPe3000.

After all, they haven't yet tried to close down any resellers for
converting HPe3000s into HPu9000s...

OTOH, there probably aren't any out there doing that :-)

--
Roy Brown        'Have nothing in your houses that you do not know to be
Kelmscott Ltd     useful, or believe to be beautiful'  William Morris