Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 1 May 1997 10:18:05 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jeff Vance wrote:
>
> Is there enough interest/need in being able to purge PRIV files that
> we should consider adding this to the CI? Is it reasonable that
> the SM (and PM?) user should be able to BUILD, PURGE, COPY, RENAME
> a priv file?
>
> If so, should CODE=nnnn be required for these command (obviously
> needed for BUILD), or should it be transparent?
>
I vote YES.
My 2 cents worth of opinions:
Of course measure should be taken to prevent accidental purging. But why this
has to take the approach of 'make it _real_ tough', as suggested by some, is beyond me.
I assume MPE exactly knows the context of any file, without me having to dig up a
filecode. So why not just give an adequate message and ask for confirmation ? E.g.:
File XXXXX is a dataset of TurboIMAGE database YYYYY.
Deleting it will corrupt database YYYYY.
Do you really, really, really ... want to continue [N] ? _
If you're warned this way and still do it, well so what. If users are _that_ dumb, they'd
better have their backups handy ;-)
Goes without saying that this should only be possible having SM and PM.
Regards,
Chris Breemer
Compuware Europe B.V.
|
|
|