Precisely. It's like meta-data. He's wrong about the original subject,
but he's right if he agrees that he was wrong about the original
subject. Although, this does not take into account the possibility of
the race condition that occurs when a woman excercises her prerogative
to change her mind. If that occurs, then you may now be wrong again
anyway. Clear as mud?

"Reynold, James" wrote:
>
> So...what your saying is that the only way he can be right is if he's admitting that
> he's wrong..which he was in the 1st place??
>
> James
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Vistica
> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2000 11:02 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Question
>
> Not if he is already admitting he is wrong about something. :-)
> (My 4 sisters and my wife assure me this is true)
>
> "Reynolds, James" wrote:
> >
> > Hopefully Someone can Answer this question for me...
> >
> > > If a man is standing in a Forest, and there's not a Woman Around and he
> > > says something...Is he still Wrong???
> > >
> > >
> > James
> >
> > > James Reynolds
> > > HP3000 System Administrator
> > > Presbyterian Health Plan
> > > Albuquerque, NM
> > > [log in to unmask]
> > > 505-923-8076
> > >