Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 6 Mar 2001 10:27:08 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Richard Gambrell wrote:
> Just about the only possible viable future for the HP e3000 is to
> stake out the middle ground for business oriented database servers that
> do Apache, Java and all the necessary up-to-date "stuff", but don't
> have the cost factor of Oracle.
amen to that!
> SQL-Server on win2000 is in this camp,
> as are some IBM solutions. If the e3000 can win (and keep) a reasonable
> share of application vendors in this market, then it has a chance for
> continued viability. MPE/iX offers significant cost savings in
> administration, too.
(boy i hope hp is listening....)
two things:
- the 'entry cost' for image is too high. by that i mean, the perception
remains that in order to have an application on a 3000 that uses image, you
have to have a custom interface written for the database. a custom
interface isn't a bad thing -- you are much more likely to have a well-tuned
application. i'll also maintain you're much more likely to find this
'design' in legacy applications. but what about *new* applications? do i
train my 20-something programmer how to do image? (do i even have my
20-something programmer working on mpe??) can i tolerate the performance
problems of odbc/jdbc?
- richard is absolutely right -- with how the computer industry has
evolved, mpe is a genuine bargain these days. but without a more modern
database, who's going to use the platform? it's more than time for another
database solution. i wish i had an answer for what that solution is. i
don't see csy dedicating a team to developing 'image2' (although i wish it
would happen). csy's forays into bringing an industry-recognized dbms to
mpe have (sadly) fallen flat on their faces. folks -- to me -- this is the
real problem. it's not mpe, it's not the lack of marketing. it's image.
it was a great database -- but not in today's world. - d
--
Donna Garverick Sr. System Programmer
925-210-6631 [log in to unmask]
"Unix _is_ user friendly.
It's just very selective about who its friends are.
And sometimes even best friends have fights."
>>>MY opinions, not Longs Drug Stores'<<<
|
|
|