Really gang!  Shouldn't the Response Center have been able to figure this
out before they told me that the fix was rolled into c.07.21?

Anyway a fix is available so I'll be ordering patches.  Now if I can just
get the RC engineer to return my call!

Carl

> -----Original Message-----
> From: CHEN,TIEN-YOU (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 1999 11:07 AM
> To:   [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
> Cc:   CHEN,TIEN-YOU (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
> Subject:      RE: Re: Performance Problem found (solution?)
>
> Hi Carl,
>
> Sorry to disappoint you.
> Yes, the IMAGE patch TIXKXL4, fixes the detaching a POSIX file from
> XM problem, however, this patch depends on MPEKXH2 patch.  Because
> of the dependency, we decided to make TIXKXL4 a site specific patch.
> That means the fix is not in the later version of IMAGE, in order
> word, IMAGE C.07.21 don't have the fix.  We will make a
> general released version (i.e. dynamically load the new XM procedure)
> in the near future.  In the meantime, user can order TIXKXL4 and
> MPEKXH2 patches for temporary solution.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Tien-You Chen
> CSY
>
> > >X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
> > >Date:         Wed, 3 Nov 1999 13:10:55 -0600
> > >Reply-To: Carl McNamee <[log in to unmask]>
> > >Sender: HP-3000 Systems Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
> > >From: Carl McNamee <[log in to unmask]>
> > >Subject:      Re: Performance Problem found (solution?)
> > >Comments: To: Jeff Woods <[log in to unmask]>
> > >To: [log in to unmask]
> > >
> > >A solution is found!  HP said that this problem is addressed
> > in version
> > >C.07.19 of Image!  Version C.07.21 is part of power patch 1
> > for 6.0!  Hip
> > >Hip Hooray!!!
> > >
> > >Do I sound happy or what! :-)
> > >
> > >Carl
> > >
> >