HP3000-L Archives

January 2006, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brice Yokem <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Brice Yokem <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:44:22 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
Consequences: None
They work for Halliburton ==> no conseqences. ;->

So why are you so much against the UN?
Did that corruption approach $10 billion? 
Not of our (taxpayers) money.

That + the costs for Katrina should come out of GWB and Dick's purse, 
don't 
you think? All their fault.

Darn an Bill only had an affair with an intern. So much cheaper. ;-)

--------------------

The article posted by you said 4 Americans were arrested.  I call 
that 'consequences'.

I am against the UN because it continues to maintain a facade of
being a humanitarian organization, yet behaves as if run by
Al Capone.

Yes, the Oil for Food corruption was approximately 10 billion
dollars.  That is enough to pay $100,000 dollars in tax free bribes 
to 1000 people for 10 years and still have 9 billion left over
for golden palaces.

Why are you so pro UN?  Even if everything about how corrupt
Halliburton is true, does it even approach $10 billion?  At 
least Halliburton can justifiably say it is there to turn a
profit and makes no pretense about being a charity.  So the 
presumption is it is there for the profit.

Katrina.  This has more to do with FEMA being a place for
employment for political cronies and that did not start with
GWB.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2