HP3000-L Archives

January 2000, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chuck Ryan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Chuck Ryan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Jan 2000 07:56:18 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
Ok, but how does this affect those of us who have already applied patches
after installing Powerpatch 1?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Cohen [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 10:38 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: MPE 6.0 and the Wonders of Installation
>
>
> Indeed, the hold on Powerpatch 1 is related to the "6.0
> Express 1 Alert --
> Important" message I posted yesterday.  We rebuilt the
> Powerpatch to include
> the new version of Patch/iX (specifically, the Linkeditor
> AUTOLED).  This
> new Powerpatch is already in use in our new systems
> preloading environment
> and will be available for shipments to existing customers in
> a couple of
> days.
>
> Other than the new Patch/iX, there is no difference between
> the previous
> Powerpatch & the new one.  Both Powerpatches contain the same
> patches, and
> any installation behavior would be exactly the same for each
> Powerpatch --
> i.e. you can still veto or force patches.
>
> Jon Cohen
> Release Management
> Commercial Systems Division
> Hewlett-Packard
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2