HP3000-L Archives

November 1995, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Eero Laurila <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Eero Laurila <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Nov 1995 00:40:34 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
James Herod ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
: This raises an interesting point (well, interesting to our site).  What CPU
: boards can be plugged into the backplane of a 948?  If our machine is
migrated
: towards being an Allbase server, we'd like to know if more horsepower is
: available for this beast (currently sporting 192 MB).
 
- I'm not sure about this one... a 948 to me rings a bell from couple
of years old series of CPU's that were 920, 922, 932, 948 and 958,
where the 958 was the highest performing machine with about 30% more
horsepower than a 948.
 
Those two 9x8 CPU's are not to be confused with the current 9x8-line,
which has 918, 928, 968 and 978 CPU's.  I'm not sure but I think if
your CPU is a 948 (from the older series, two generations ago -- the
product line before 9x7(nova) CPU's)...  I think the only CPU faster
than 948 that would work would be the 958 (not sure if you can get
these boards anymore -- most likely not from HP unless there are
some re-marketed ones...).
 
Cheers,
Eero - HP CSY Networking lab.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2