Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 8 Aug 2000 18:18:04 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Gavin Scott wrote in message <[log in to unmask]>...
>One excuse for dropping the power-fail support was that modern CPUs now
>contain too much state (big caches, etc.) to flush out to main memory in the
>time available between when the line voltage drops and the time that the
>3000's power supplies can no longer support operation of the CPU. Thus the
>requirement for a UPS starting around the time of the 9x8 boxes.
Since the 917/LX has a larger cache (96KB) than a '918/LX (64KB), the term
"excuse" seems appropriate. I imagine either cache could be flushed to
main memory in about a millisecond or less, which would be no problem
for even a "cheap" power supply to buffer. Of course, a 997 might need some
pretty big Capacitors to flush it's cache(s). I think the decision to start using
'ordinary' disk drives after HP decided to exit the Disk business might have
been another reason. Most HP drives were power-fail aware and
could maintain consistency when the power died (I think the HP C2590AM
drive was the last of the Powerfail-proof drives). Of course, I've seen
installations where the CPU Box had a UPS, but not a rack of connected
external Seagate drives with no powerfail smarts ........
Winston K.
|
|
|