HP3000-L Archives

November 1996, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Lancaster <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bill Lancaster <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Nov 1996 12:32:05 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (60 lines)
Gregory said:

>
>Ok. I could use a primer on user volumes. I tried reading Volume
>Management and just didn't get it on a casual read. Here I am dealing
>with an Oracle on UNIX guru who wants to know how to control the logical
>devices (meaning the UNIX conception, not LDEVs), so the more I can
>understand this, the better. Care to start this thread, Bill?
>

I just cruised the HP3000-L archives for a discussion we had about this a
few months ago.  With the miracles of cut-and-paste, here are some of the
thoughts:

Quote:

There has been lots of dialogue about the pros and cons of doing this but I
think that
we can summarize by saying the following:

1.  There are lots of pros.
2.  There don't seem to be any serious remaining cons.

The pros are:

1.  Better system resiliency in the event of a disk mech failure.
2.  Better overall performance due to the smoothing out of transaction
management
 posting activity (each volume set effectively receives its own XM).
3.  Better positioning for high availability solutions (mirrored disk
requires user volumes)
4.  More operational control of disk environment.  You don't need to perform
a complete
system install in order to add new disk drives.

The cons are:

1.  Initially, it's a pain in the butt to set up.
2.  Requires (slightly) more overall disk space to manage effectively.
3.  Slightly more operational awareness required in a user volume environment.

At HP World, several of us were involved in an HP 3000 system performance
roundtable.  I think that we reached consensus that user volumes are good
but mainly for
environments which have more than 4-5 disk drives.

Another issue which is of prime importance is that you must be sure to keep
enough disk space in the MPEXL_SYSTEM_VOLUME_SET to handle all of your
transient disk space
requirements.  Most of us at the conference agreed that you need a minimum
of 3-4 disk
drives to handle the transient requirements in a medium or larger installation.

End quote

---
Bill Lancaster         Lancaster Consulting
(541)926-1542 (phone)  (541)917-0807 (fax)
[log in to unmask]       http://www.proaxis.com/~bill

ATOM RSS1 RSS2