Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:57:45 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
--- Dane Bodamer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Thanx !... I thought 73GB was the limit. I guess I'm just
> wondering if MPE will hang, halt or perform poorly, if I go 144GB. I
> suppose the only way I can find that out is if someone had tried it.
i believe if you were to attach a drive large than 73gb, mpe would
simply ignore the space beyond that limit. i'm reasonably certain
that's how mpe behaves if you're on an older version of the os and you
replace ldev 1 with something larger than a 4gb disc drive -- the extra
space is ignored.
if it were me and this were a production box....i would try for
anything beyond 73gb. it might be considered a 'career-threatening'
move.
you should also give some consideration to the performance impact of
trying to configure large luns in general. t-boxes (99x) have a pretty
limited back plane. maybe chuck can address this issue better.... - d
=====
Donna Garverick Sr. System Programmer
dgarverick -at- longs -dot- com
925-210-6631 Longs Drug Stores
Come, my friends, 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.
Tho' much is taken, much abides; and tho'
We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are.
"Ulysses", A. Tennyson
>>>MY opinions, not Longs Drug Stores'<<<
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|