John Lee said:
> 
> Geez Wirt, you're startin to sound like GWB!
> 
> No raging...just arguing constitutional law.
> 
> John Lee

I thought we delegated Constitutional Law to Eugene?

BT








NNNN
Tracy Johnson
MSI Schaevitz Sensors 

> -----Original Message-----

> 
> On 6/3/2005, "Wirt Atmar" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> >John writes:
> >
> >> Well said John, although obscene words fall under the definition of
> >>  obscenity, or "offensive to the average person" (my pre-law
> >>  classes).   Cute plays on words, I'm contending, aren't 
> offensive to the
> >>  average person.  If they were, then many advertisements 
> would be ruled
> >>  obscene.  Seen many commercials lately that don't use 
> sexual innuendos?
> >
> >I personally don't consider them "cute words." They were 
> clearly highly
> >suggestive and they don't belong on campus. But more than 
> anything, they were a
> >tacky thing to wear. I would never let a daughter of mine, 
> if I had had one, ever
> >wear anything like that.
> >
> >Did I mention before that I believe that parents are the 
> first, best teachers
> >of their children? Those lessons extend far beyond calculus 
> and history. They
> >include a sense of grace, elegance and honesty more than 
> anything else.
> >
> >I think you're raging against the whole wrong end of the stick, John.
> >
> >Wirt Atmar
> >
> >* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> >* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
> >
> 
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
> 

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *