HP3000-L Archives

January 1997, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Neil Harvey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Neil Harvey <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Jan 1997 16:21:32 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Terry observes........

>
>Just to make one more point on tiers
>
>I just upgraded from a 957 to a 959/200.
>You might ask why a 959/200 instead of a 969?  Because one of my software
>vendors had such a strange tier structure, that a 959/400 is actually in a
>lower tier than a 969/120!   go figure.
>
>
Time to insist on User-Based pricing, I'd say.
I have an intense dislike for this upgrade mentality, as well as stupid
copy protection schemes that ALWAYS fail when first installed, and this
ALWAYS occurs over weekends/at midnight when the Vendor offers ABOLUTELY
no support.

I have come across instances where (no names mentioned) a customer was
able to buy and fund a powerful development machine with a five
developer license, as well as a huge CPU upgrade with a user runtime
license for the same price (or less) than the Huge Upgrade with full
development. Very Silly Indeed.

Neil

ATOM RSS1 RSS2