Rodolfo Lopez ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
: John Joerger wrote
 
: I agree twice. JAM is a LOT slower than View and for our CJ users their
: complaints on performance outweigh its benefits.
 
Curious, I wonder why.  I guess its that View is accessing Image via totaly
native means.  I would imagine that the JAM stuff is using ODBC or other
TCP/IP means of data query.
 
We use JAM and noticed that it's responce time is directly tied to network
activity.  Especialy when using ODBC.  Oracle's SQL*Net is a effected less
for some reason.
 
But, developing in JAM is a DREAM!!!  I cracked the package open and within
90 minutes had a full blown application built to search a history table.
 
Joe