Yeah, I agree, I could've given him information if I could
think of a way to get it to him.

-----Original Message-----
From: Stan Sieler [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:08 PM
To: Nichols, Gibson (G.M.); [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Jeff, Your email system is not working


Re:
> Yes, I agree.  I just didn't think it would be
> proper to give all that information to the
> spammers.

> > Mr. Kell, your email system rejected an email I sent you.
>
> When that happens, it's *VERY* useful to include a copy of
> the headers from the rejected message.  They very often tell
> us why you were rejected.

You miss the point.

You're doing the equivalent of posting a one line
"my system crashed...why?" message.

Without information, it's difficult to diagnose the problem.

Your email may have been rejected due to the problems UTC is
having (see Jeff's post today).

Or ... as seen more and more often ... it may be rejected because
the recipient thinks your system is facilitating spam (or that your
message is spam).

Or ... maybe your mail had a "sensitive" word in it that triggered a filter
(no, I don't think UTC uses such).

Or ... it may be something else.

In any case, the rejection information may provide useful clues.

Here's a tip: you should have provided information upon request ...
even if it was just via private email.


--
Stan Sieler
           [log in to unmask]
www.allegro.com/sieler/wanted/index.html
       www.allegro.com/sieler

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *