HP3000-L Archives

August 1998, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Kell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jeff Kell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 26 Aug 1998 19:25:57 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Lee Gunter wrote:
>
> Are you asking why the low- and mid-range systems don't have HSC and
> fiber channel in their future (actually, I believe the 979KS-x00 and
> 989KS-x00 will) ? ... because the 997 (and later) Corporate systems do
> or will support these features.

Well, the 939-989 are essentially the same box with different CPUs, so
I don't see the difference/bias/strategy for treating them differently.
They don't discriminate across the K-class 9000s.

Now granted the 99x has the HP-PB expansion kits while the 9000s don't
(or does the T-class?), but is this a matter of channels, bandwidth, or
both?  You can get 8 HSC slots in a 370/380/570/580 if you can settle
for a 4-way CPU instead of 6.  Maybe I'm missing something obvious.

Jeff Kell <[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2