Paul writes:
> However, Jeff's suggestion, while it eliminates superfluous processes, will
> NOT "solve" Allen's original request of producing a list of "unmatched"
> records.
That's true. The process Allen requested is going to intrinsically require
some sort of set subtraction. The processes that have been mentioned up to
now in POSIX have only been doing set unioning.
Wirt Atmar
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *