HP3000-L Archives

September 1999, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wirt Atmar <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 26 Sep 1999 23:44:00 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Denys writes:

> If I were you,
>  I would consider getting Windows NT and not the Windows 9x.  The only two
>  reasons to get Windows 9x  are a) it's a home computer and you have games
>  are not supported on NT or b) you have hardware that you absolutely must
>  and it is not supported, yet, under Windows NT.  I use my laptop all the
>  doing a wide range of things.  It is my only system.   I run NT
exclusively
>  it and have never had the need to go back to 95.

Denys writes the party line, but I must admit, I have yet to understand it.
We run all three versions of the OS here: 95/98/NT, with virtually identical
software on all of them. On a purely objective basis, 98 appears to me to be
by far the most stable of the three.

Wirt Atmar

ATOM RSS1 RSS2