Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 26 Jan 2000 15:06:15 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Wirt has a good practical solution:
> ... I feel that they are essentially safe enough so that day-to-
> day backups can be transferred from one machine to another
> without placing the backup at the same risk level as the primary
> .... Backups are accomplished, even over a 10Mbps LAN, at
> about the same speed as they are to DDS tape
If and when we get fiberchannel discs on the 3000, there will
yet another even much faster method: Use multiple volume
sets on one 3000; and put that volume set in another box up
to 10km away (for single mode fiber), and (maybe) up to about
3km away (for good multi-mode fiber). Then just do a disc-to-
disc backup on the 100 MB/sec fiberchannel; about two orders
of magnitude faster (at least in theory) than 10 Mb LAN. :-)
That is fast enough that even large databases can be copied
quickly. For sites that are "almost but not quite" true 7 x 24
(and therefore might be able to avoid running one of the online
backup products or Shareplex / NetBase), this is... er.... will
be the fastest backup method I know of.
In addition, with the above scenario if you use roll-forward
IMAGE logging and put the IMAGE log files on the user volume
in the remote disc farm, you will have a completely up-to-the-
second off-site copy of all database transactions....
.... of course fiberchannel for the 3000 appears to be a ways
off yet.... <sigh>
Ken Sletten
|
|
|