Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Terry C. Shannon |
Date: | Sat, 8 Dec 2001 11:31:52 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
"Peter da Silva" <[log in to unmask]> wrote in message
news:9utagq$ff@web.nmti.com...
> In article <[log in to unmask]>,
> David Swanson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > It's not that I'm particularly fond of Microsoft or their products or
their
> > practices, but that I can understand them and see the reason they feel
that
> > some particular desicion or product is the direction for their company.
>
> OK, I can see Microsoft's point of view. I can understand why they make
> the decisions they do. It's even rational, if you accept their premises.
>
> That doesn't change the fact that those decisions cause endless amounts of
> wasted make-work for millions of people, because Microsofts goals are only
> indirectly related to theirs.
>
Well, as long as people keep buying Microsoft products and patches
("Upgrades" in Redmond-speak), Microsoft will continue to pursue the same
strategy. The public has been gulled into paying perfectly good money for
mediocre products. If such was not the case, there'd be a heck of a lot more
MPE and VMS out there!
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|