Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 29 Jan 2003 12:46:54 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Doug,
The Unix shell sees the semicolon and separates the two commands into
mpe << jobfence 7
and then
queue=pyjobqueue
What you probably want is:
mpe << EOI
jobfence 7;queue=payrollque
EOI
When you use the << syntax (sometimes called a HERE document), the
shell will read the following lines until it gets to a line that has
the value of the string just after the <<.
So,
mpe << BLAHBLAHBLAH
jobfence 7;queue=payrollque
BLAHBLAHBLAH
Does the same thing.
James
SunGard Bi-Tech
http://transport.bi-tech.com
[log in to unmask] (Doug) wrote in message news:<[log in to unmask]>...
> I am a newbie to MPE. Our vendor's application uses a MPE shell on
> hp-ux. I want to send a command to process via a script and cron but
> am having trouble. I am unsure if the issue is MPE or not.
>
> The vendor has a batch_job unix process that runs as a service. You
> can modify the parameters of the batch_job by executing this from the
> unix prompt:
>
> mpe
> :jobfence 7;queue=payrollque
> :bye
>
> There are 4 job queues, one of which is a default and is called
> STANDARD. When I try and run the command from a script it modifies
> the standard queue, not the one identified after the semi-colon. I am
> assuming the semi-colon has a MPE meaning such as eof -or- unix is
> reading that as a cr/lf.
>
> I have tried a couple things:
>
> mpe << jobfence 7;queue=pyjobque
>
> using various combo's of redirection << | ^M !
>
> Ideas?
>
> Thanks in advance
> Doug
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|