Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 26 Jul 1995 13:21:27 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 02:25 PM 7/25/95 -0700, Jeff Vance wrote:
....<snip>...
>We have a long history of preserving compatibility. We make many customers
>happy when their old programs, JCL, UDCs, etc run the same way on a new
>release of the OS. In fact they expect it.
I'm not sure I see how the assumption of unspecified parameters as an un-quoted
info string would neccessarily preclude the use of the old style ';info="..."'
>We could reduce the chances of
>a conflict more by testing if the 2nd parm is a number and if not assume
>an un-quoted info= string?? However this may lead to less predictable
>behavior and therefore may not be desireable. If a control variable is used
>the default may have to be the "old" way.
I wouldn't mind too much if the default was the 'old' way.
In Unix, users can select from a number 'CI' shells which provide a wide
range of differing conveniences and capabilities. Come to think of it isn't
that what the POSIX shell is supposed to be about?
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
: :
: Scott Herman [log in to unmask] Yale-New Haven Hospital
:
: Dept of Lab Medicine 20 York Street :
: (203) 785-2449 New Haven, Ct. 06504 :
: :
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|