Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 29 Dec 2000 10:40:48 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
for search engines sake I've reposted this misposting.
SMAPImail does inbound and is up-to-date with the lastest MIME variations
including Aol 6 and Lotus Notes 5.0. if anyone needs it on 6.5. I don't
know if people know but it's very difficult to keep one piece of code
up-to-date with all the various flavors of MIME floating around but
hopefully it's up-to-date for inbound use (for outbound use this doesn't
come into place since you need just one flavor). Since most of the mail is
outbound on the HP 3000 this doesn't come into play much, but if your app
requires an inbound attachment it's an imperative. It uses NETIPC so some
of the berkley socket issues don't apply and may be of use if you got your
back up against the wall.
-chris flynn
www.emailinc.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Newton, Tony <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: Is this Sendmail trap familiar to anybody?
> Mark
>
> I'm actually not using Sendmail/iX for anything except outgoing mail. Is
> this problem supposed to only strike inbound mail users?
> ___
> Tony Newton
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Bixby [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 11:17 AM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Is this Sendmail trap familiar to anybody?
> >
> >
> > Yes, very familiar if you're trying to do inbound e-mail with
> > Sendmail/iX. See
> > my HP3000-L posting from yesterday:
> >
> > http://raven.utc.edu/cgi-bin/WA.EXE?A2=ind0012d&L=hp3000-l&F=&
> > S=&P=20099
> >
> > I lack the bixby.org time to fix this problem in Sendmail/iX.
> > An alternative
> > way to fix this would be to submit an enhancement request to
> > HP asking for all
> > of the fields in /usr/include/pwd.h after "the following fields are
> > uninitialized until further notice" to be initialized with
> > NULL for the
> > pointers and zero for the integers. The POSIX functions
> > getpwnam() and
> > getpwuid() would need to be enhanced to supply these default
> > values. Such an
> > enhancement would be very consistent with other "porting
> > enabling" work the lab
> > has done in the past and continues to do in the future.
> >
> > But enhancement requests submitted by real life customers
> > mean more than
> > internal enhancement requests submitted by CSY engineers.
> > The HPRC is waiting
> > to take your call. ;-)
> >
> > If somebody does file this enhancement request, please let me
> > know what the SR
> > number is so I can mention it on my Sendmail/iX web page.
> >
> > - Mark B.
> >
> > "Newton, Tony" wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > Does anybody recognize this Sendmail error? I'm getting it
> > on several of my
> > > 6.5P1 machines. The last time that I used Sendmail it
> > worked fine, but that
> > > was when I was on 5.5P7.
> > >
> > > SYS/PUB:mailx -s "Backup has completed" newtont2
> > >
> > > .
> > > EOT
> > > Null message body; hope that's OK.
> > > newtont2... User unknown
> > > **** Data memory protection trap (TRAPS 68).
> > >
> > > ABORT: SENDMAIL.PUB.SENDMAIL
> > > NM PROG 390.00074170 buildfname+$30
> > > [1] + Done(138) ?
> > > 9044198 Bus error /SENDMAIL/PUB/SENDMAIL
> > >
> > > run mailx.hpbin.sys;info='-s "Backup has completed" newtont2'
> > > Program terminated in an error state. (CIERR 976)
> > > PHP6-SYS/PUB:
> > >
> > > ____
> > > Tony Newton | [log in to unmask]
> > > HP Systems Admin | (503) 574-5831
> > > Providence Health Plan | www.providence.org
> > >
> > > <<All views are mine and probably only mine>>
> >
> > --
> > [log in to unmask]
> > Remainder of .sig suppressed to conserve scarce California
> > electrons...
> >
>
|
|
|