HP3000-L Archives

December 2003, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brice Yokem <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Brice Yokem <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:50:13 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
I've read and heard everyone of the items that he's listed many times on the
standard news channels. But there are substantial caveats with every item
listed as well, and they are an even more important part of the story.

------------------------

This goes to what Mr Card has said, in the 'Yes, but' part of his article.

------------------------

If we do this right, the United States is likely to be integrally involved
in
the development of Iraq for the next 30 to 50 years. If we do this wrongly,
we will abandon them in the next 2 to 3 years and we will have to revisit
the
area many times in the future.

----------------

30 to 50 years may be an exaggeration.  We will see.

In any case, I agree with Mr Ritenour's statement that even if 1/3 true
is it pretty good.  An from what Wirt has stated, it appears to be at
least 1/3 true.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2