HP3000-L Archives

September 2001, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gavin Scott <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Gavin Scott <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 14 Sep 2001 15:36:54 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Steve writes:
> WRT detecting the items you list, I think 100% physical searches of both
> passengers and carry-on items will have a success rate well over your
> 10%.

If you're willing to be strip searched in order to travel, then sure, for
about an hour until everyone involved gets really tired of the process.

But to do this kind of inspection even minimally, we're talking about having
people remove their shoes, be personally x-rayed by one of the new ultra
low-power systems that you stand against (which are good enough to tell what
religion you are :-) while the $5 an hour rent-a-cops try to figure out if
that's a bomb or just some part of your anatomy.

Plus a meticulous hand examination of every piece of luggage, possibly
banning any electronic device from checked or carry-on luggage, etc.

I think people will stay home first.

G.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2