HP3000-L Archives

June 1996, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Gambrell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 19 Jun 1996 10:13:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
> I think this great to hear. Do you think that group of HP people that
so
> often seem to tout the demise of the HP3000 realize that when HP
needed a
> RELIABLE, FAST, EASY TO MANAGE...on and on, computing platform to
> process their most critical application, HP chose the HP3000 and
MPE/iX.
>
> In shorter terms, if you had $40 billion sales would you really want
it
> on a Un*x box?  NOT ME!
> **  Chad Gilles                    **
 
More than likely HP couldn't get its applications to run on HPUX and it
already did on MPE, so they didn't have a choice since they'd announced
the unpugging deadline...
 
I'm more than anxious to see how HP responds to the MPE futures question
at HP World.
 
Richard G
([log in to unmask])
(vist us at http://www.xula.edu/)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2