 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | |
| Date: | Fri, 28 May 1999 09:40:49 -0700 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
JM,
Can I suggest that you post this message to the Interex EMC list? You can
subscribe as follows:
>The High Availability Forum of Interex is pleased to announce that
>EMC and Interex have formed a new mailing list, [log in to unmask] The
>purpose of the mailing list is create a communication vehicle in
>which you can discuss your issues and share your ideas regarding EMC
>products with EMC and yourpeers. EMC will participate actively in
>the discussions to ensure your questions are answered.
>
>Instructions to subscribe to the list:
>sent email to: [log in to unmask]
>In the subject field type the word: subscribe
>
Bill Lancaster
At 10:16 AM 5/28/99 GMT, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>Hi,
>
>we implemented an EMC˛ SRDF configuration between a source HP3000 and a
>target HP3000 series 979.
>
>The 979 target is daily working with HP disks
>(Emc˛ disks in Readonly mode). In case of backup, we reboot it on Emc˛ disks
>(not seeing HP disks: FW-SCSI cards are not defined in SYSGEN when using that
>config group).
>
>We recently read in an EMC˛ document that in case of backup
>(using Emc˛ disks), we should have to disconnect the SCSI link of the HP
>internal disks and unplug them. That seems to be crazy in case of emergency !
>On the other hand, we rebooted the 979 system many times using Emc˛ disks
>only without any trouble.
>
>Does anybody use such a configuration ? Can
>someone validate that information which was never provided to us by Emc˛
>neither HP until today ?
>
>If any, is that restriction to be applied to all
>9x9 series or only for 959/969 series ?
>
>Thanks to all for helping us on that
>subject.
>
>JM.
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>
>
|
|
|
