HP3000-L Archives

February 2001, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Larry Kinnicutt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Larry Kinnicutt <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:25:20 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Thansk for the response, looks like user error. I found that I didn't have
the modules seated properly.

----- Original Message -----
From: <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>; <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: Memory for 9X7's


> The memory IS the same.  Possibilites:  1) Did you skip any slots when
> installing the additional memory?  I don't recall if empty slots between
> modules are allowed (suspect not). 2) Did you install the additional
memory
> in identical pairs?  They come in identical sets of 2 boards or 3) I
suspect
> (but am NOT sure) that the largest sets of memory must be installed
FIRST -
> there's a good chance that I'm wrong on this though.  4) "loose"
connections
> - these things are or should be very tightly mounted in the carrier board
> connectors.  5) static damage???  Hope not.
>
> Try returning the memory to the 927 - still works? Try a swap of carrier
> boards. Boards should have identical part #s.
>
> Wayne Boyer
> Cal-Logic
> PS: so what's going to happen to that poor stripped 927????  Is it going
to
> be an orphan looking for a new home?  I'm going to be acquiring more 9x7s
as
> they get phased out of use by companies.  Let me know.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2