Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 3 Dec 1999 07:23:28 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jeff,
I vote fot placing this on the INPUT command. Tom makes a good point about
the PAUSE command, but as the input command already has a timeout parameter
as well as other features, I like the idea.
Also, perhaps HP shouldn't limit themselves to the console. Maybe any
terminal device or class. That way it could fit into more environments.
Not awake yet.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: VANCE,JEFF (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 4:34 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Brain Took a Vacation
Hi all,
While this topic is fresh, does anyone care to propose a
syntax for a new CI command, or an extension to the INPUT
command (and/or input function) or a new CI function??
Is it worth having a built-in 'repeater' ability, so the request
is repeated at the console. Should there be a timeout? Should
there be some basic cursor control/memory lock ability? etc..
regards,
Jeff Vance, CSY
> What is the command or option that will pause a job until
> there is a reply from the operator. Would like it to operate
> like the INPUT command.
|
|
|