HP3000-L Archives

May 2004, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Emerson, Tom" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Emerson, Tom
Date:
Thu, 27 May 2004 13:28:10 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
> From: Craig Lalley
> > Christian wrote:
> > As spelled out ...
> > 'The clock speeds of ... are affected with software.'
> 
> Ok, this is a very politically in-correct question.... but...
> 
> If the chip is slowed down by software, how is it done?

I'm not sure, but...

> Would the famous no-op command help here?

I suspect not -- at this level, you'll be dealing with hardware issues related to timing -- if the system is relying on a counter to determine timeouts, the counter will increment faster, and the system will wrongly believe a timeout occured.
 

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2