Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 20 May 1998 17:48:22 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
After Nick said:
>> Then again there is Transact. Not as fast as a "VISUAL"
>> language, but it has won several language shootouts in the past.
>> Not as expensive as COGNOS.
>> Easier to learn than Speedware.
>> Faster than COBOL.
John Clogg said:
> Wait a minute, Faster than COBOL?!? I assume you mean
> development time, and not run-time efficiency...
Certainly faster development (maybe 10-40 percent of the code
for most reasonable applications), but to best of my knowledge
on the average NOT any slower run-time either. Transact/iX
compiles into a pure NMPRG file or a module you can put in an
NMXL, just like COBOL. Only the old CM Transact still runs in
interpreter mode; that was supplanted on MPE/iX systems like
seven or more years ago.
And NM Trandebug/iX provides a real slick host-based symbolic
debugger. Old rumor has it that several third-parties bought
Transact/iX some years ago just to get a detailed look at the
capabilities of Trandebug/iX because it was so good....
For many years on Classic platforms the answer to the slow
interpreter was FASTRAN from Performance Software Group,
a.k.a. Nick. :-) FASTRAN would (and still will) give you a
CM PROG file.
Ken Sletten
|
|
|