HP3000-L Archives

May 1998, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sletten Kenneth W <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Sletten Kenneth W <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 May 1998 17:48:22 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
After Nick said:

>> Then again there is Transact.  Not as fast as a "VISUAL"
>> language, but it has won several language shootouts in the past.
>> Not as expensive as COGNOS.
>> Easier to learn than Speedware.
>> Faster than COBOL.

John Clogg said:

> Wait a minute, Faster than COBOL?!?  I assume you mean
> development time, and not run-time efficiency...

Certainly faster development (maybe 10-40 percent of the code
for most reasonable applications), but to best of my knowledge
on the average NOT any slower run-time either.  Transact/iX
compiles into a pure NMPRG file or a module you can put in an
NMXL, just like COBOL.  Only the old CM Transact still runs in
interpreter mode;  that was supplanted on MPE/iX systems like
seven or more years ago.

And NM Trandebug/iX provides a real slick host-based symbolic
debugger.  Old rumor has it that several third-parties bought
Transact/iX some years ago just to get a detailed look at the
capabilities of Trandebug/iX because it was so good....

For many years on Classic platforms the answer to the slow
interpreter was FASTRAN from Performance Software Group,
a.k.a. Nick.    :-)     FASTRAN would (and still will) give you a
CM PROG file.

Ken Sletten

ATOM RSS1 RSS2