HP3000-L Archives

May 2004, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Christidis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 12 May 2004 15:11:14 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
The scans were 'ordered' by management, and while I'm sure I could ask for
an exemption, I'd like to know if the scans, somehow, contributed to the
problem.  Many companies are adopting these 'scanning' policies in order to
discover vulnerable servers or weaknesses in their networks.

Regards
Paul Christidis

HP-3000 Systems Discussion <[log in to unmask]> wrote on 05/12/2004
02:27:23 PM:

> This is obvious, but definitely encourage your user to except the 3000
from
> "What's up Gold", assuming that you can argue acceptable up time to
exempt
> it from the scans.
>
> Greg Stigers, MCSA
> this space for rent
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2