HP3000-L Archives

August 2000, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jean Huot <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jean Huot <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Aug 2000 19:41:12 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
As far as I know partial backups on back those files listed in the store.
Any image database which is partially restored onto an existing database
that was modified since the backup will results in inconsistencies serious
anough to make the database useless.

Jean Huot
Northern Credit Bureaus Inc.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rich Trapp" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 5:14 PM
Subject: [HP3000-L] TURBOSTORE question...


> Gang,
>   Ok, I feel ignorant w/o a box to play with...I guess humility is good
for
> me. (no comments Art!)
>
>   Some of my cohorts are asking if a partial backup will store only the
> datasets that have been modified, or if it will store the entire database.
>
>    We're working on some recovery plans and we're wondering if restoring
the
> latest partial over the latest full will cause the database to be
> inconsistent.  Doesn't seem likely even if only rootfile and datasets that
> have changed are stored...everything should be consistent (right?).
>
> RAT
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>  Rich Trapp "RAT"
>  Managed Business Solutions   [log in to unmask]   http://www.mbsnav.com
>  Assigned to Design Automation Support at Agilent Technologies
>  Telnet or 970-679-2221 [log in to unmask]  Loveland, CO USA
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2