HP3000-L Archives

March 2003, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Craig Lalley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Craig Lalley <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 14 Mar 2003 19:42:50 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
--- Dane Bodamer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>         I am actually doing some testing now using Data Protector 5.0
> (former OmniBack II).  And yes, it was real slow over the 100 BaseT link.
> It took like 20 minutes to backup 70Mb ...

Dane,

Something is wrong there 70mb in 20 minutes?  Just a couple questions.

What type of CPU do you have?  Are you doing software compression?

The reason why I ask is that the 100 BaseT utilizes the system CPU where as the
10 mb has a cpu on the card, hence less overhead.

So if you have a 928 running a whopping 48Mhz, plus software compression, plus
a 100Mb card, it could be giving you the speeds you are seeing.

Somethings not right.

-Craig


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
http://webhosting.yahoo.com

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2